X-Men: The Last Stand (2006): **½
Directed by Brett Ratner
I waffled back and forth between three stars and
two-and-a-half stars for quite a while on this film. On the one
hand it is not a very good movie. On the other hand I had a surprisingly
good time while watching it. Ultimately, since I am writing this
review a month (or more) after seeing the film, good taste wins
out over a fleeting visceral experience.
Probably my main problem with the movie was the
strange decision to saddle it with two plots. The first X-Men
movie was about stopping Magneto from using his mutation-causing
machine. The second X-Men movie was about
stopping Stryker from going through with his plan. This X-Men movie
is about dealing with the "mutant cure" (a plotline that
was ripped along with the character of Kavita Rao from Joss Whedon's
run of writing the "Astonishing X-Men" comic) and
also with dealing with Jean Grey's transformation into the Phoenix.
At barely 100 minutes the movie does not have enough
space to deal with both of these plots. Surprisingly, it is the
Phoenix plot (generally considered to be the best slash most important
storyline in the history of the X-Men comics, if not in comics at
as a whole) that generally gets shoved to the side in favor of the
cure plot.
Also because of the short running time several
characters get the shaft. Rogue, who was arguably the most important
character in the first X-Men movie and was definitely a main player
in X-2, here is relegated to maybe 10-15 minutes of screen time.
Colossus, who is important enough to end up being one of the X-Men
who helps make the title-mentioned "last stand" has maybe
10-15 lines in the whole film (and is inexplicably is missing his
trademark russian accent). The whole Warren Worthington III (Angel)
subplot seems entirely under-fleshed, although the opening flashback
showing Angel's budding mutation is absolutely horrifying and very
effective. Indeed, most all of the emotional aspects of the movie
seem to be rushed over in order to try to work in the mechanics
of Magneto's plot to deal with the cure and the X-Men's (well, mostly
just Wolverine's) plot to stop it.
The plot also has some problems, in that it builds
up to a big climax and then doesn't seem to know what to do once
it gets there; most of the villains just kinda stand around except
for Juggernaut and someone who was supposed to be Callisto (I think)
while the X-Men fight the faceless mob of The Brotherhood.
That's another thing: When Magneto forms his Brotherhood
he gathers as his closest leutenants several characters whom I didn't
recognize (other than Juggernaut and Mutliple-Man). I see from looking
through the credits that the super-fast lady was supposed to be
Callisto, and there was even Psylocke in there (though damned if
I spotted her). But for the most part his posse of mutants are nameless,
faceless, basically powerless extras. Seemed a strange choice considering
the fabulous and varied characters that could have been chosen from
the 40-year history of the franchise.
A lot of people I know have problems with Magneto's
"grand entrance" at the beginning of the climax, but I
didn't find it any more ridiculous than half of the crap that has
happened in the comics over the years. I think, though, that the
first to films established a certain believability to the world
and this film treated it more as a comic-booky world. I didn't find
it too hard to accept, even though I know that Alcatraz is about
500 feet too far away from shore for the whole thing to even work
at all...
What I liked about the film was that it surprised
me pretty consistently. Even though the overall story arc was not
surprising (and I knew before going in what the end of the movie
would be even though nobody had told me; it was just obvious to
me), there were several moments throughout the film that jolted
me and made me think, "Holy crap, they actually did
that!" In big-budget blockbusters, especially in sequels, that
type of surprise is a rare commodity. Much like the climax of Serenity,
it helped to create an atmosphere of "anything is possible
and nothing is sacred" that always helps a movie feel more
fresh and exciting.
Another thing I really enjoyed was the shocking
moral ambiguity of the film. A lot of the characters do a lot of
really questionable moral things, and the movie doesn't seem to
take sides on a lot of this. It probably isn't on purpose; most
likely the filmmakers didn't realize the questionable nature of
some of the choices and therefore did not make overt emotional overtones
attached to them. But it allowed me to make my own decisions. What
do I think about what Wolverine (always a terribly morally ambiguous
character) does during the course of the movie? About Xavier's meddlings
in Jean's mind? About Beads & Wolverine's decision on how to
end the big fight with Magneto? About Rogue's role in the movie?
Since the filmmakers didn't seem to notice that there was anything
"iffy" going on in a lot of these, I am left to make up
my own mind, which I actually greatly appreciated.
Say what you will about Brett Ratner as a director,
but this is what I say: Brett Ratner is an entirely competent and
unremarkable director. He has no real style of his own, but he is
entirely able to direct action scenes and have them be coherent
and exciting, something Bryan Singer was entirely unable to do during
the first X-Men film. I don't really blame (many) of the failures
of this movie on Ratner, but rather on some of the strange choices
made in the script. In fact it is probably because of Ratner's facility
with action direction that this mish-mash of a movie was enjoyable
at all. If they'd had another 20-30 minutes linger on the Phoenix
plot and delve more into some of the emotional ramifications of
what was going on, then I would definitely recommend this movie.
As it stands, though, I can only say that I had a good time while
I was watching the movie, but I don't really feel much like watching
it again.